Happy Retirement Officer Roy…

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on September 8, 2016 in Current Edition |

Titusville Police Department loses a great Officer Today…after nearly 30 years (two months shy of 30 years), Officer Brian Roy #732 pushes his car for the last time today. Officer Roy was the Officer that always had a smile on his face, and addressed people like people should be addressed: respectful, and valid.

Many people will never know the many things Officer Roy has done for the city, and the community,  but I know that he will be sorely missed. Congratulations on your Retirement Officer Roy, and the best of good fortune and blessings to him and his wife Christine Roy, as they begin the new chapter of their lives.

Officer Brian Roy retires from Titusville Police Department today 9/8/16

Officer Brian Roy retires from Titusville Police Department today 9/8/16

Share on Facebook

Tags: ,


Brevard Sheriff Deputy Yousef Hafza Secures Bail For Road Rage Murder Of Palm Bay Man

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on August 30, 2016 in Current Edition |
Brevard Sheriff Deputy Yousef Hafza Secures Bail  For Road Rage Murder Of Palm Bay Man

Brevard Sheriff Deputy Yousef Hafza Secures Bail
For Road Rage Murder Of Palm Bay Man Click for more…courtesy of VX.  

Share on Facebook
No tags for this post.


In The Defense Of Dana Delaney – Part 7 Volusia Exposed

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on August 29, 2016 in Current Edition |
Click image to read in the Defense of Dana Delaney Loyd

Click image to read in the Defense of Dana Delaney Loyd

Share on Facebook
No tags for this post.


Assistant State Attorney Michael Hunt Named Florida’s Outstanding Prosecutor of the Year by Florida Prosecuting Attorneys Association

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on August 23, 2016 in Current Edition |

Congratulations to Michael Hunt!Assistant State Attorney Michael Hunt, a 37-year advocate for crime victims, has been selected as the recipient of the Outstanding Prosecutor of the Year Award by the statewide prosecutors association, State Attorney Phil Archer announced today (Tuesday, Aug. 23).Pictured l to r: State Attorney Archer and Assistant State Attorney Hunt.

Hunt prosecuted both felony and misdemeanor cases before his selection as Felony Intake Division Chief 28 years ago. In that slot, he has lead a team of attorneys who make critical decisions on whether sufficient cause exists for a criminal charge in what has been more than 7,000 cases per year in Brevard County. He has also conducted more than 325 Grand Jury proceedings during which defendants face murder or other extremely serious charges.

But, as State Attorney Archer said, it is not the weightiness of his work that pushed Hunt past other veteran prosecutors; it is the willingness to give to the community. Hunt has served as a valued and trusted resource for law enforcement seeking arrest or search warrants no matter the time of day or night for the extent of his career and his decisions have been unerringly accurate and on target, Archer wrote in his nomination.

“Mr. Hunt is often the first person officers and deputies reach out to in the event of a homicide or other major crime,” Archer wrote.

In addition to his phenomenal recall of chapter, verse, and citation of legal rulings, Hunt lives a precept that is the bedrock of his success: he treats all–cops, victims, defendants–with respect. Over the years, he has remained in contact with many of the crime victims he has served; he has had defendants confess to him; and, he is warmly regarded by criminal justice professions from the support staff to the judge’s bench.

Archer also wrote “these burdens are carried [by Hunt] with grace, with optimism, and with the greatest sense of professionalism and commitment I have ever witnessed.” Archer’s sentiments are echoed in the 33 signatures from judges and criminal justice professionals who seconded the nomination.

The award will be formally presented at the association’s fall meeting in Panama City in November.

The Gene C. Berry Award naming the Outstanding Prosecutor is given annually in memory of the prosecutor from Florida’s west coast who was gunned down in the doorway of his home in 1982 by the wife of a man he sent to prison on drug charges. A plaque bearing the names of the yearly recipients hangs in the governor’s office. Two prosecutors from the Eighteenth Circuit have been previous recipients of the award: Assistant State Attorney Tom Hastings in 2003 and Assistant State Attorney Chris White in 2011.


Lynne Bumpus-Hooper

Research and Communications Assistant for State Attorney Phil Archer



(email) lhooper@sa18.org

Follow us on Twitter @SA18PIO

Share on Facebook

Tags: , ,


Former BCSO Deputy Accepts Plea Bargain In Sexual Misconduct Arrest Watch Courtroom Video

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on August 18, 2016 in Current Edition |

Former BCSO Correction’s Deputy Taylor takes a plea….


Click image to continue reading...

Click image to continue reading…

Thank you VolusiaExposed.com for your continued dedication to Brevard’s Best News while I am in the penalty box. Dana

Share on Facebook
No tags for this post.


Kovacs’s Corner: A word on Law Enforcement Cameras Marc Kovacs

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on August 14, 2016 in Current Edition |

The public’s encouragement and desire for Law Enforcement wearing        “body cameras” has been a good  thing for Law Enforcement.       The truth is coming out that a majority of  Law Enforcement Officers do nothing wrong and most complaints are unfounded.    Part of the problem that we see is the media driven desire to “sell stories,  sensationalism and advertising”.  One incident is repeatedly shown by                       every media outlet and  is shown numerous times.  This leaves the public the illusion that there  are multiple incidents occurring as you witness the story numerous times.   Are there corrupt (all inclusive for “bad” cop) Law Enforcement officers?   Of course there are, more so in the administrations.  The administrations contain more corruption than you could ever imagine.   The Chiefs and Sheriffs routinely subscribe to the mantra of “take care of the city (county)” at all costs.   This is what is taught in management schools, so they do not really care about the  citizens/ residents.  They take care of the organization, which is in direct contrast to  “community policing”.  Officers and Deputies are expendable to the organization.   As long as the Chief (Sheriff) and the city (county) official are protected and  insulated it does not matter who is “disposed of”.  How does this tie into “body  cameras” you may ask. Why are Law Enforcement Officers opposed to cameras?              Citizens have the  misconception that cops do not want cameras because                                 the cops are   “hiding” their “wrong doings”, when in fact the truth is that they know that  agencies will utilize the camera recordings to seek out policy violations  to allow the agency to say, “ see, we are staying on top of our officers”.      Officers get written up because a  third party that is reviewing the video begins looking for every violation of policy.   Look, every time you drive you break a  law.  It is virtually impossible to follow every traffic law that is in writing.                            EVERY driver plays  the odds when  driving, whether you fail to use a turn signal, drive one mile an hour over the speed limit,      cross the white  line when coming to a stop and numerous more.               If an officer witnesses a violation,  they decide whether or not to act on the violation and if Law Enforcement enforced every violation       you would never get a “cop” when  you called.  Cops know that modern        administrations subscribe to the  mentality that they MUST be  oppressive and enforce every policy they can to maintain discipline.                            The belief of keeping    the cops under  the thumb and well disciplined just shows the public that “they” are in control.   I had a good friend pull up to a burglary in progress, took off his seatbelt as he was  braking the car to get out and confront TWO subjects that were burglarizing a business.   He apprehended both of them, by himself.  The Agency Administration WROTE HIM UP with  DISCIPLINE because as he was shifting to park, he took his seatbelt off BEFORE  coming to a complete stop.  A third party reviewer watched the video and noted the policy  violation that the car was in motion and the officer had his seatbelt off.

Now, we move onto YOUR own desire to allow Law Enforcement              to violate your rights and the laws.  It is almost humorous that a majority of complaints that are  reviewed on video are found  to have NO merit or the complainant was actually in the wrong,  while officers did nothing  illegal or wrong towards the complainant.   Yet, people are demanding officers are provided  video cameras to protect “the public”.  The masses accusing officers of excessive force and  “killing without cause”, claiming officers are akin to the “Brown Shirts” of the Third Reich.   Then the facts are shown in video and those officers now have video evidence that they  acted properly, while activists burn down cities.  OK, so where is all of this heading?   In Florida, you do realize that you cannot be recorded in your own home or area where  you have an expectation of privacy without your consent?  So this means that  Law Enforcement Officers need to seek your consent BEFORE recording you or  you can tell them to turn off the recording device.  If you are in a public setting,  anyone can record anything without permission.  Under the Fourth Amendment  you have a right to protect yourself against unreasonable search and seizure.   A recording of your statements and or actions is a “seizure”.  Most people do not  care about being recorded in their homes by the “police” and they just do not  understand the value of protecting your rights.  Once you give up a “right” it is  very difficult to “reclaim” it.  That innocent video of you, in your home, talking to an  officer, that is interviewing you about a crime you were a witness too,  could lead to your statements being twisted or even used against you.                                Go back and  re-read the example of how easy it is to use a “video”                            against someone in an  administrative manner and think about the ramifications of this.  Now, this is not meant to be legal advice as I do not give legal advice.   This is for your own thought process and consideration when “allowing” or “just ignoring” a  violation of your rights that we all scream that we have and are entitled to.

Some of the other incidents that people and agencies are not taking into consideration  is the medical side.  Officers responding to a car crash and their cameras capture  all of the gore and horror, as well as the glib  comments made by the responders to help maintain their sanity are now recorded.  A recording by a public official now becomes public property (public record).  So a public records request made could potentially  release this material into the public.  The video of anyone injured at a fight call or a  drunk or even a suicide attempt.  These can fall under the HIPPA (Health Privacy act, in short)  if information regarding the injury, medical condition or some other factors are present.  Again, a public records request can be made and  private information is now available, how about the person providing their  personal information for an officer’s report? Of course, there are arguments  to be made by agencies to not release information by  “their policy”, words used to scare citizens into going away.         You also need to understand that “policies”  never trump your legal rights.  Polices are “guidelines” implemented in an agency  to govern their behavior.  They are meant to be an “operating manual” of sorts,  never meant to be a concrete “you will always….”.   Of course administrators love to enforce these policies as stone, the new                  “management” mentality  (never confuse management with leadership…..).

Back to our camera discussion……In short an officer can record you in your own home or private area if you             grant them permission.  If they come to your home or an area that you  “have exclusive authority/control” over, you can tell them to turn it  off.  That will “piss most cops off” honestly and YOU must decide if you want       to exert your rights or allow  them to record you in your private area.  Just realize that once you do, it is difficult to argue     later that you did not want it to occur.  This also leads to officers/ investigators       recording you without your  knowledge.   As with Ms. Loyd and her court issues, she was recorded, secretly by an investigator             of the Brevard  County Sheriff’s office.  You have an investigator that activates his recorder in his car,  announces the  location and who he is talking to, exits his car and goes up                  to Ms. Loyd’s home.   Speaks to her, NEVER  advises her that he is recording    her with the voice recorder   hidden in his pocket,  goes inside her residence and sits down.  He never advises her of her rights,  that she is a subject of an investigation,         does not have a WARRANT to “capture her audio statements”  secretly and NEVER asks  permission to record her in the  PRIVACY of her own home.  Going over everything ……this is a FELONY crime committed by a Law Enforcement officer.   In addition is also a Federal Crime under 18 USC 2510,    which basically states what we have talked about.

Under the federal Wiretap Act, it is illegal for any person to secretly record an oral,  telephonic, or electronic communication that other parties to the communication  reasonably expect to be private. (18 U.S.C. § 2511.) In twelve states,  no person may record a private communication without the consent of  every party to that communication. Thus, no surreptitious recording is allowed  (with exceptions for law enforcement officials who have obtained warrants  to make such recordings).  The states with these laws are California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois,  Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada,     New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington.

Under Florida statute 943, Law Enforcement is allowed to                record certain things without notifying the  “subject” they are being recorded.    This statute was put into place to allow recording of “undercover”  operations to obtain evidence of a criminal activity.  Narcotics Investigations, “buy busts”,  Prostitution Stings, and other operations like that.                             These type operations are supposed to  be well defined and the scope is  specific in nature.  There is a written and clearly defined objective, which ensures that the       statute us not  “abused” as commonly occurs with “permissive” authority.   These incidents are the exceptions and should not be the rule.   Investigations and Law Enforcement 101 always dictate that “you” should obtain  a warrant when you have time, this ensures that doubt cannot be cast upon your actions.

My entire point in all of this is that WE need to be cautious in what we want from our          Law Enforcement  because we may just get it.  Allowing video and audio recording as a blanket  expectation can cause some serious issues to come to light, especially when public  records requests are made for the video.  All of the  equipment and recordings are owned by the tax payers and if it is not an open        investigation or involving  children (or VERY FEW exceptions) they are subject to PUBLIC RECORDS release.   Just think about that for a moment, what is sitting on your car seat that would  be captured on video and released to the public  records request? Sure, the ability to record actions is a good thing in most cases,     but technology can also  intrude on us and strip our basic rights away.   What are you willing to give up for a problem that is minimal, but blown up by the media?

Share on Facebook
No tags for this post.


July IA’s from BCSO courtesy of Volusia Exposed

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on August 12, 2016 in Current Edition |

Thank you to Volusia Exposed for continuing to cover Brevard County, here are July’s BCSO IA’s….


Agent Yousef Hafza – Murder:

Sgt. Jason Diogo – Threats Towards A Civilian:



Both have been added to Brevard’s Brady Copy List





Share on Facebook
No tags for this post.


Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot… Volusia Exposed Takes a Look @ Brevard’s Finest…

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on August 8, 2016 in Current Edition |

Read The Latest Sex & Domestic Violence Allegations
Coming Out Of The Brevard County Sheriff Department
How Brevard’s Finest Handles Handjobs – Ménage à Trois & Domestic Violence Issues
If You Are Under The Age Of 18
Get Your Parents’ Permission Prior To Reading These Investigative Reports

Earlier this year (2016) VolusiaExposed.Com decided to develop a new section within our website devoted to the coverage of Brevard County.

We felt an obligation to assist BrevardsBestNews.Com’s Chief Editor – Dana Delaney Loyd in her excellent coverage of Brevard – due to her August 2015 arrest by the Brevard County Sheriff Department over her coverage, and her call to the Florida Child Abuse Hotline regarding concerns she developed of whether a father was sexually engaging his pre-teen daughter.

Want to know more about Loyd’s arrest and on-going prosecution – check out our articles in the defense of Loyd.

Continue reading:

Click image to continue reading...

Click image to continue reading…

Share on Facebook
No tags for this post.


Hello Readers!

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on July 28, 2016 in Current Edition |

I posted some information on Facebook on 7/27/16, and I am sharing it here now. Thank you for all of the kind words that have been received.

An elected prosecutor of Brevard county gave an infamous quote that states in part: “… the importance of truthfulness in every detail”. I want to follow that statement. Therefore, I am sharing with you that Brevardsbestnews.com is in negotiations to transfer ownership of website. The three possibilities are:
Larry Lawton, the owner of The Reality Check Program, author, TV show host.
Larry Carter: Retired Law Enforcement Officer with decades of Law Enforcement rolls, with both Melbourne Police Department, and Brevard County Sheriff’s Office, Law Enforcement trainer and currently the owner of the L Carter group.

The third potential interested owner has stated that they wish to remain anonymous, but I can tell you that they have a well established media outlet.

In speaking with all three potential new owners they all plan on keeping with the motto that Brevard’s Best News has focused on, and that is
“Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.” Mahatma Gandhi.

Brevard’s Best News has a wide variety of readers, to share some stats from the month of July 2016:

Most visiting countries
Countries Amount
United States 431390
Unknown 58719
European Union 41552
Ukraine 27942
France 25399
Germany 14076

As decisions are made, and contracts decided upon, I will keep you abreast. In the meantime, thank you Volusiaexposed.com for carrying on my dream, covering two counties has to be exhausting, but your dedication has been amazing, and we sill continue to share their posts.

Another potential interested new owner has reached out today. My husband is on vacation next week, and we will weigh all options, and keep you informed. If anyone has any ideas or is interested in taking over ownership, please email me at Danadelaney14@gmail.com

Again, thanks for all of the comments…We LOVE our readers, and will strive that whatever decision is made, YOU the READERS will have a VOICE!!!

Share on Facebook



Thanks VX! June’s BCSO’s Investigations

Posted by Brevardsbestnews on July 22, 2016 in Current Edition |

Deputy Eric Firmin – DV-Sex-Lies

Deputy Patrick Ford – DV-Alleged False Report By Civilian

BCSO Agent Matthew Preston – DV Allegations

Numerous BCSO Staff – Near Jail Escape

Share on Facebook
No tags for this post.

Copyright © 2013-2017 Brevard's Best News All rights reserved.
This site is using the Desk Mess Mirrored theme, v2.5, from BuyNowShop.com.